Due to the fact that the signature of the leader in the certificate issued to the syrup may have been forged, an examination was established

The former head of the pharmaceutical network development agency S. at the next meeting of the court on the “Dok-1 max” syrup, which is considered to be the cause of the death of 65 children in Uzbekistan.K. one of the lawyers representing the interests of Temur Rahmatov on the certificate of medicines such as” Dok-1 max“,” Ambronol " S.K. says he may not have signed. The lawyer assumed that the signature on these certificates was an electronic signature, which could have been used without the permission of the leader. 

Under my protection S.K.ga in the indictment, Marion Biotech Pvt. Ltd. 12 of his enterprise's medicines were issued certificates of 2022, which were examined in this process and charged that these (referring to events related to the death of 65 children, editorial comment)could have been avoided. Defendant S.K. in both the initial investigation and the trial, he mentioned that the signatures were facsimile (electronic signature) signatures. While the investigating authority withdrew facsimile signatures, the signatures on the drugs certificate did not clarify the facsimile or the signature the leader had personally placed. The documents show, for example, the signature on the certificates issued to the drug “Dok-1 max” and “Ambronol” S.K.niki is not, " says lawyer Temur Rakhmatov. 

Lawyer Rakhmatov in the procedure of Article 22 of the Criminal Procedure Code from the court caused the arguments of Marion Biotech Pvt. Ltd. he requested the appointment of a correspondence and technical examination of the court in relation to the 12 medicines of his enterprise, as well as signatures on certificates issued on March 4, 2022. 

We did not see the origin of the certificates issued to these drugs. There are only copies. In my opinion, the scanner option will also be obtained before the certificate is issued by the agency. Although it is through this, it is not difficult to know whether the signature on the certificates is a facsimile signature or a signature he personally made. Given that this process takes a certain amount of time, we are now filing a petition so as not to be expected later, " said the lawyer. 

Lawyer Rakhmatov added that when the signatures on the copy of the certificates were compared, S.K.what is assumed to be not the signature of appears to be of the same form, while the signatures he personally placed have differences. 

The jury, listening to the opinion of lawyers and defendants on the lawyer's petition, explained that they will return to this petition later, and why such a verdict will be made on this. 

According to the case, we are the person in charge of formalizing the statement to clarify this U.T.ni we will return after questioning. In this case, not only Hadicha Suleymanova, there are also state experts in other places. We U.T.ni after questioning, we ask for a specialist. Then we return to this issue. The petition was approved by.T. we will return after being questioned. No objections? "said Moses Yusupov, presiding over the court case. 

Lawyer Rakhmatov informed by gesture that the court had no objection to this ruling.